archivio-blog-archivio-blog-2014

===> OFFICIAL Website/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 2nd Official Profile Missing Children Denise Pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Missing-Denise-Mp-cerchiamodeniseit-Gruppo-fondato-da-Piera-Maggio/22...

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Friday, March 14, 2014

DENISE, DO YOU REMEMBER THE ANGEL SERAFINO, YOUR PLAYMATE WITH WHOM YOU USED TO SAY LITTLE PRAYERS?

MISSING DENISE PIPITONE - DENISE, DO YOU REMEMBER SERAFINO, YOUR PLAYMATE WITH WHOM YOU USED TO SAY PRAYERS?

THE PRAYERS OF THE SERAPHIM ANGEL >> http://www.cerchiamodenise.it/angeloserafino.htm

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Page, Groups and Profiles:

===> OFFICIAL Web/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 1st Group www.facebook.com/groups/missingdenisemp

=> 2nd Official Profile www.facebook.com/missing.pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page www.facebook.com/pages/Missing-Denise-Mp-cerchiamodeniseit-Gruppo-fondato-da-Piera-Maggio/2273463340...

____________________________________________________________________________________

Friday, March 21, 2014

Mazara del Vallo: The memory of Denise Pipitone forgotten in the “Villa al mare”

The memory of Denise Pipitone forgotten in the "Villa by the sea"

It certainly makes a strong impression and makes you think, that sign almost on the ground standing in front of that little, very neglected tree, dedicated to little Denise Pipitone who disappeared on September 1, 2004 in front of her home on via

Domenico La Bruna. The scene of the devastation is Villa Jolanda, one of the two villas in the city.

That little tree and the sign wishing Denise Pipitone a happy birthday were planted in 2006 on the occasion of the little girl's sixth birthday, a tribute wanted by her schoolmates.

The incivility of some people over these years has had its effects, so much so that Piera Maggio herself, Denise's mother, once declared: "the city does not forget Denise, even if some actions make me reflect a lot, like a stone star, given to me and placed on the little tree dedicated to Denise, at Villa Jolanda, but stolen after a few days." Well dear Piera Maggio, we do not agree, perhaps it would be better to say, and we do so with much sadness and also anger, that the City remembers Denise Pipitone only on September 1st each year, to remember her disappearance, and only on October 26th, to remember her birthday.

How evident it is in the municipal villa is an excellent indicator of the attention paid to the never-solved case of little Denise. Certainly, the vandals should be condemned—perhaps the same ones who broke some ceramic vases, motivated—as emphasized by the mayor—by political reasons, but no one has noticed the condition of that sign (see photo), now rusted (we assure you this time it's not the sirocco's fault, which has left us in peace for days), and of the little tree? We have noticed that the same conditions have persisted for months.

Yet almost every morning a team of municipal workers seems busy cleaning and pruning the plants of the same villa, which a few years ago Mayor Cristaldi called the "villa by the sea" because it is right in front of the "beach in the city".

Is it possible that no one noticed this outrage and ignoble act, possible that no one (even among the many attentive on Facebook reporting comments etc.) informed the mayor of what happened? In short, the same lack of attention as when some spray-painted writings appeared on the front part of the nearby Norman Arch; even then the authorities found out through the press. (Source: PrimaPagina Mazara) 21-03-2014 8:40

*****

FROM THE OFFICIAL FB PROFILE ===> www.facebook.com/missing.d.mp Piera Maggio replied:

Thank you for bringing to light what WE have always noticed over the years, and which hurt us so much that we decided to pretend this place Dedicated to Denise did not exist.

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Pages, Groups and Profiles:

OFFICIAL FB PROFILE

===> OFFICIAL Website/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 1st Group www.facebook.com/groups/missingdenisemp

=> 2nd Official Profile www.facebook.com/missing.pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page www.facebook.com/pages/Missing-Denise-Mp-cerchiamodeniseit-Gruppo-fondato-da-Piera-Maggio/2273463340...

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Piera Maggio and Piero Pulizzi: “Denise must be remembered with actions and not just words” Denise should not just be remembered....

Piera Maggio and Piero Pulizzi: “Denise must be remembered with actions and not just words”

Denise should not only be remembered, but the attention due to a missing child, not a dead one, should be maintained." The appeal trial related to the case of her alleged kidnapping will begin on April 18 in Palermo.

Piera Maggio and Piero Pulizzi: “Denise must be remembered with actions and not just words”

"We have always noticed this over the years and it hurt us so much that we decided to pretend that this place dedicated to Denise did not exist." This is what was stated by Piera Maggio and Piero Pulizzi (both in the photo), mother and father of little Denise Pipitone,

following our publication last March 21 of an article regarding the poor condition of the sign and the little tree, at the very central Villa Jolanda, dedicated to the little girl who disappeared on September 1, 2004 in front of her home on Via Domenico La Bruna.

The little tree and the sign wishing Denise Pipitone a happy birthday were planted on October 26, 2006, on the occasion of the little girl's sixth birthday, a tribute from her schoolmates. For months, the flowerbed that should commemorate the disappearance of little Denise Pipitone has been in a state of evident neglect.

Several years ago, unknown individuals stole a stone star that had been donated and placed near the same little tree in Villa Jolanda. It is unclear why none of the various municipal workers who are daily engaged in cleaning the same municipal villa have noticed the poor condition of that sign, now rusted, and of the little tree (photo 2).

Thus Piera Maggio and Piero Pulizzi declared: "We have deliberately not spoken about this place anymore; believe us, it hurt us so much to see the neglect and carelessness of that place. Just imagine, a couple of months ago the tree was being strangled by a wire that was once stuck in the ground. If, in Denise's memory, for the institutions it is only September 1st when she disappeared, and October 26th, her birthday, but if actions followed as well, it would be even better and commendable. Anyway – they concluded – Denise should not only be remembered, but the proper attention should be given to a missing child, not a dead one." The appeal trial related to the case of her alleged kidnapping will begin on April 18 in Palermo.

23-03-2014 11:50 Source: Primapaginamazara.it

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Pages, Groups and Profiles:

OFFICIAL FB PROFILE

===> OFFICIAL Website/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 1st Group www.facebook.com/groups/missingdenisemp

=> 2nd Official Profile www.facebook.com/missing.pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page www.facebook.com/pages/Missing-Denise-Mp-cerchiamodeniseit-Gruppo-fondato-da-Piera-Maggio/2273463340...

___________________________________________________________________

Friday, March 28, 2014

From the Facebook profile of lawyer Frazzitta Giacomo. Denise case: continued publication of parts of the appeal filed by Piera Maggio.......

From the Facebook profile of lawyer Frazzitta Giacomo.

Denise case: continued publication of parts of the appeal filed by Piera Maggio and parts of the acquittal sentence of Jessica Pulizzi: "It appears highly inconsistent, from a logical point of view, to consider, as the first Judges did, that the 'sideways' glances cast by the defendant could be 'the result of a plausible (and perhaps inevitable) "attitude" since it cannot be expected of an adolescent... to repress a feeling of curiosity and to prevent her from lingering her gaze on someone she suspects to be her sister."

Such behavior might appear admissible, were it not marked by all the other unequivocal, criminally relevant actions, such as:

- telephone disturbances;

- insults on the street;

- telephone threats;

- the stalking of Piera Maggio after leaving work;

- the repeated passages aimed at insistently observing little Denise near the residence on via D. La Bruna;

- the cutting of the wheels;

a series of behaviors that, certainly, are characterized by a single objective: to make life impossible for Piera Maggio.

In this regard, it is inaccurate to claim that Piera Maggio did not react to Jessica's harassment, except in some episodes where the young Jessica greatly exceeded the limit.

In fact, Piera Maggio reported that she had turned to her sister-in-law, Anna Corona, Giovanna Marino, as well as several times to Piero Pulizzi, but in any case the "demeanor"—correctly using this term, which etymologically has a positive connotation of behavior, in this grammatical context and not as used in the sentence, because in any case Jessica Pulizzi's behavior cannot be defined as "demeanor"—shown by Piera Maggio on all occasions provoked by Jessica was one of indifference to avoid giving rise to further and much more serious incidents, even if this served no purpose.

Well, the aforementioned behaviors certainly do not run the risk of being suggestive, as they are detailed and characterized by actions unequivocally aimed at obsessing Pietra Maggio and her family members—elements which, according to well-established experience, define the so-called “unhealthy” relationships arising from unresolved separations.

The judgment reads: Here too, always with the aim of removing the risk of falling into misleading suggestions regarding the "intensity" and "exceptionality" of such feelings, it must be emphasized the radical and evident heterogeneity—on the competing levels of gravity and the legal interests harmed (the wheels of a car; the freedom/life of a child)—between the criminal act confessed by the defendant and the one under investigation in this proceeding. From this perspective, there is such a disproportion between the two episodes that it is not permissible to draw from the first a reliable indication of that criminal capacity and that emotional power that would inevitably constitute the psychological substrate for the realization of the other.

( cf. judgment pp. 84-87 )

It is impossible not to notice a short-sighted reasoning insofar as the rules of experience come to the rescue, which, from 2004 to today, have led the Legislator to reassess these "anomalous behaviors," apparently harmless, which in most cases have resulted in partner homicides and extremely alarming crimes (entire families exterminated by neighbors), typifying such conduct with a specific offense such as, for example, art. 612 bis of the penal code, further aggravated recently with an amendment introduced with the so-called security package of August 2013.

The judges labeled Anna Corona's conduct as "criminally insignificant," downplaying her multiple behaviors, essentially regarding the disclosure of a secret. (continues)

***

April 2, 2014 - Denise Case: publication of the appeal filed by Piera Maggio continues: "To support these assessments, the First Judge uncritically relies on the statements of Pulizzi Jessica and on the confirmation given by her sister Alice, going so far as to state that 'the daily normality' described by Pulizzi - but not otherwise verified, adds the undersigned, - 'appears incongruous with the premeditation of the crime and with the approach of the moment of its execution. The fact that Jessica Pulizzi on the morning of September 1, 2004, was engaged in daily activities (purchasing clothes; blood test; school enrollment), is not even sufficient to serve as an "alibi" with respect to the criminal act' (see judgment p. 49).

With this statement, the first Judges confirm that Jessica Pulizzi's defensive intent was achieved, since it is precisely this "normal" daily routine of chores which, if on the one hand according to the Judges is not suitable to provide an alibi, on the other hand, however, allows her innocence to be demonstrated, precisely because the normal sequence of meetings and handling of domestic affairs is hardly compatible with the serious event she is alleged to have committed that morning.

Nevertheless, it could have its own valid reason for being if the facts narrated by the defendant were objectively confirmed by the testimonies of the various witnesses; otherwise, the account she gives of that morning must be considered false.

First of all, it should be noted that Jessica Pulizzi was questioned on September 2 and 3, 2004, giving a completely false version, but according to the Judges of the Court this was due to her young age, 17 years old, and the "immaturity of the behavior shown by Pulizzi (as emerges from the conversations intercepted inside the police station) in dealing with the seriousness of the crime and with the risks of her involvement in the investigation."

It is truly difficult to understand the logical reasoning of the Judges, which goes against the millennia-old rules of experience in evaluating reticent and false statements made immediately by those informed of the facts, whose position subsequently worsens.

Furthermore, it is not taken into account that, being a minor at the time, a close relative was present on both occasions when she was questioned. In fact, on September 2 the maternal grandmother was present, and on September 3 Anna Corona, who was also interviewed on the same occasion, so this should have led her to make her daughter reflect on what she had actually done on September 1.

Furthermore, if Jessica Pulizzi is too immature to grasp the significance of her false statement in relation to the seriousness of the crime and the related risks of her involvement, it appears contradictory that the Judges state, when referring to the motive, that there is a disproportion between the exceptional nature of the event and the actions she had previously taken against Piera Maggio.

The two motivational points in strong contradiction are juxtaposed:

Also here, always with the aim of removing the risk of falling into misleading suggestions regarding the "intensity" and "exceptionality" of such feelings, it must be emphasized the radical and evident heterogeneity—on the competing levels of gravity and the legal interests harmed (the wheels of a car; the freedom/life of a child)—between the criminal action confessed by the defendant and the one under investigation in this proceeding. From this perspective, there is such a disproportion between the two episodes that it is not possible to draw from the first a reliable indication of that criminal capacity and that emotional power that would inevitably constitute the psychic substrate for the realization of the other.

( cf. judgment pp. 84-87 )

“immaturity of the behavior shown by Pulizzi (as emerges from the conversations intercepted within the police station) in dealing with the seriousness of the crime and with the risks of her involvement in the investigations” (see judgment pp. 172-173)

The motivational contradiction appears in all its amplified evidence, because if the defendant on the one hand is, according to the Judges, too immature to grasp the gravity of the false statements and to confront, in this sense, the crime, then, even more so, on the other hand, she is so immature as not to grasp the seriousness of the act she committed; therefore, it is possible to draw from the conduct carried out before the kidnapping of little Denise a clear indication of that criminal capacity, which is precisely detectable in immaturity.

......

Well then, the false statements made during the first two days undermine Jessica Pulizzi's credibility from the outset, regardless of the assessment of the defendant's immaturity which, in any case, if taken into consideration, must be evaluated by applying it as a measure at every moment of her behavior.

Nor can "immaturity" influence the defendant's conduct positively, becoming a justification for it.

At this point, it must be done one step at a time and, it should be specified that Anna Corona was questioned by the Carabinieri on September 1, 2004, and on September 3, 2004, by the Public Prosecutors and the Captain of the Carabinieri at the Mazara del Vallo Station.

The daughter Jessica Pulizzi was questioned on September 2, 2004 by officers of the Police Station and on September 3, 2004 by the Public Prosecutors and the Carabinieri Captain at the Mazara del Vallo station.

Therefore, according to the rules of experience and, considering the particular relationship between mother and daughter, if the minor Jessica, questioned by two magistrates and several Carabinieri, does not grasp, due to her immaturity, the meaning of what is happening to her, it nevertheless cannot be considered plausible that the two women, questioned repeatedly in the days immediately following, did not communicate to each other what they had reported to the investigators.

Well then, even though Anna Corona was, at the same time, Jessica at the Carabinieri station to be questioned by the investigators, she says nothing about September 1st with reference to what her daughter did, nor does it seem plausible that the daughter did not speak with her mother about what she told the investigators." (continues)

***

April 4, 2014 - From the FB profile of lawyer Giacomo Frazzitta.

Denise case: here is what the Judges write about the intervention of law enforcement at the Corona house at 3:30 pm on September 1, 2004: "Instead, in a manner completely contrary to the correct application of the verification criteria, they state: 'No probative value can be attributed to the vague recollections on this point by the police officers: in this regard, it seems implausible that the witnesses, after eight years and without having developed any uncertainty about the ownership of the apartment, would have retained the memory of such a marginal (and apparently) insignificant gesture, especially considering the context of an extremely patchy and often mutually contradictory recollection'" (see judgment p.207)

Well then, the fragmentation of the circumstantial assessment on this point is evident, as there can be no doubt that it was the Crown who let them into that residence, having confirmed it in court and this fact having been corroborated by qualified witnesses such as the very officers who personally experienced the event.

The first Judges, at this point after analyzing the statements of the officers and the neighbors of Corona, namely, Giacoma Pisciotta and her daughter Emanuela Di Giorgi, continue the logical and motivational development by outlining the case as follows: “At this point it is necessary to dwell, in order to assess the evidentiary findings regarding the alleged 'deception' carried out by Anna Corona, on three significant aspects addressed by the P.G. witnesses:”

- the reasons for the meeting with the Crown …..

-on the subject who made the proposal to continue the conversation inside the ground floor dwelling …..

-on the reconnaissance activity carried out inside that apartment, which if performed (moreover with the consent of the Crown) would assume decisive evidentiary value, as well as on the erroneous belief in which the law enforcement officers fell regarding the ownership of the residence, also due to the deceptions carried out by the Crown.

Regarding the first aspect, Tumbiolo, Accomando, and Di Girolamo reported that they went to the Corona's house to search for the missing girl. (see Judgment p. 205).

Starting from the first of the questions posed by the Judges on “the reasons for the meeting with Corona,” the Court considers that the chronology of events leads instead to the conclusion that the police officers went to Anna Corona’s house to look for Piero Pulizzi. In fact, they had first gone to his home in Via Valdemone without finding him, and thus came to the conclusion that: “From this perspective, the explanation offered by the other people present at the meeting appears more coherent, as they essentially stated that they understood that the visit was part of the search (not for Denise but for) Pietro Pulizzi. (See judgment p. 207)

This passage of the sentence is characterized by a particularly short-sighted pedantry regarding the reasons that led those police officers to Anna Corona's house.

In fact, no contribution can be offered by the people present, namely (Anna Corona, Jessica Pulizzi, Giacoma Pisciotta, and Emanuela Di Giorgi), since the officers, in carrying out their duties, maintain, precisely for reasons of investigative secrecy, a certain rigor in explaining the reasons for their intervention. This is taught to us by the rule of experience, so to deduce from the statements of the subjects who were the object of their verification the true motivations for their intervention appears illogical as well as misleading.

We must not lose sight of the central point of the matter, namely that the officers learn at Piera Maggio's house the true paternity of Denise, which is why they go to Pulizzi's house to look for the child, and not finding her, they go to Anna Corona's house, but the object of the search is always the child.

So much so that they also indicate it in the service note drawn up at the same time as the events.

In that report drafted on September 2, reference is made to the activity they carried out on September 1, in the afternoon, and all the witnesses report what was noted, that is, that they went to Anna Corona's house after not finding Pulizzi at his own home, and "that Corona let them into the house, allowing them to verify that inside there was no presence of the minor who was the subject of the search." (See Report of September 2 from the Police Station) (Continued)

***

April 4, 2014 - Denise case: final assessments by the Judges on the intervention of law enforcement at Anna Corona's house: "Now, the glaring contradiction in which the Court stumbles is taken to the extreme in its conclusions where it states, among other things, that: '...it seems much more plausible that the (uncertain and partial) memories of Di Girolamo (and the other law enforcement officers) were deeply influenced by inductive experiments, all based on the (false) premises that (also) at that time they were engaged in the search for the child. And indeed, it seems much more likely, for the reasons already indicated, that they were actually looking for Pietro Pulizzi, the child's "hidden" father, and that the conflicts between Anna Corona and Pietra Maggio had not yet even emerged.'

For the reasons set out, the circumstance under analysis must be considered radically uncertain in its occurrence, and therefore must be completely excluded from the overall evidentiary reasoning” (Cf. judgment pp. 208-209) (ID EST!)

Therefore, according to the first Judges, these are "memories conditioned by inductive experiments, all based on (false) premises"; this judgment could be based on its own logical reason at the moment in which there was no verification, indicated in the descriptive annotation of the activity of September 1st carried out at Anna Corona's house, regarding the urgent survey of the places and things, having a descriptive function of facts and situations, carried out urgently, before the Public Prosecutor took over the direction of the investigations.

But if, in addition to the urgent investigation, there are also, after 8 years, the testimonies of the Officers of the Judicial Police from both the Carabinieri and Police forces, who took part in the unrepeatable activity, the “unreliability of evidentiary data” asserted by the First Judges is revealed in all its incomprehensible error in law and in fact." (continues)

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

DENISE WE ARE LOOKING FOR YOU! IN THIS PHOTO YOU ARE LESS THAN 4 YEARS OLD......

DENISE WE ARE LOOKING FOR YOU! IN THIS PHOTO YOU ARE UNDER 4 YEARS OLD, YOU ARE IN YOUR MOTHER PIERA'S ARMS. IF YOU CAN REMEMBER ANYTHING, PLEASE CONTACT US! WE MISS YOU SO MUCH! (Share and ask others to share, to help in the search for Denise) Thank you in advance for your cooperation

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Pages, Groups, and Profiles:

OFFICIAL FB PROFILE

===> OFFICIAL Website/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 1st Group www.facebook.com/groups/missingdenisemp

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152369747059283&set=a.310285554282.183299.301565724282...

=> 2nd Official Profile www.facebook.com/missing.pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page www.facebook.com/pages/Help-us-find-Denise-Pipitone/227346334003135

LINK QR CODE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152198876089283&set=a.10152198874739283.1073741842.301...

_________________________________________________________

Friday, April 11, 2014

INITIATIVE SPREAD AND KEEP ON YOUR PHONE THE PHOTO IN QR CODE OF DENISE WE ASK ALL OF YOU TO JOIN THIS REQUEST....

INITIATIVE SPREAD AND KEEP THE PHOTO OF DENISE'S QR CODE ON YOUR PHONE WE ASK ALL OF YOU TO JOIN THIS REQUEST. Just download (copy) this image to your smartphone and send it via WhatsApp, Line, Telegram, Viber, etc. to your phone contacts! (SPREAD THIS INITIATIVE) thank you (SPREAD SHARE DOWNLOAD)

Download LINK QR CODE MISSING DENISE PIPITONE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152198876089283&set=a.10152198874739283.1073741842.301...

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Page, Groups and Profiles:

OFFICIAL FB PROFILE

===> OFFICIAL Website/Site : www.cerchiamodenise.it

=> 1st Group www.facebook.com/groups/missingdenisemp

=> 2nd Official Profile www.facebook.com/missing.pipitone (Piero Pulizzi)

=> 2nd Fan Page www.facebook.com/pages/Help-us-find-Denise-Pipitone/227346334003135

_________________________________________________________________________

Saturday, April 12, 2014

ON THE 18TH IN PALERMO, THE APPEAL TRIAL BEGINS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS JESSICA PULIZZI AND GASPARE GHALEB.

WE WANT DENISE FREE, WE WANT JUSTICE, CHILDREN MUST NOT BE HARMED.....

DENISE PIPITONE: On Friday the 18th, the trial against Pulizzi Jessica and Gaspare Ghaleb begins at the Court of Appeal in Palermo.

WE WANT DENISE FREE, WE WANT JUSTICE, CHILDREN MUST NOT BE HARMED...

>> MISSING DENISE PIPITONE <<

Official Fan Pages, Groups and Profiles:

OFFICIAL FB PROFILE